Yes. Everything here is F2U, but not always F2E. You should ask the artist for permission before editing/splicing, unless it explicitly says F2E.
That doesnāt answer my question. I want to use these in splicing but i need permission to do so
If you want to have a discussion, this is the thread for it. Iāve told you before.
You did? I didnāt see, sorry
Itās fine, I just would rather it have to declutter the entire thread again.
To answer your question everything in the repository is at least free to use. As these are AI portraits they are by default free to edit as per the rules regarding them.
1 Like
Does anyone know how to get in contact with N246? I didnāt know about the F2E rule and edited his animations without asking for permission. I can bring down the post if necessary.
Animations by default are assumed to be f2e in the repo. There are specific cases where that isnāt the case though iirc, you can always message the user here to ask permission to be safe
Question, If i were to submit them to the repo, if i could at all, how would i name the portraits to distinguish that they were AI generated?
Iām split ok that tbh.
My current idea is to just replace the author with āAI-generatedā as nobody really can claim any ownership over it (this is also the legal consensus from what Iāve read)
Iād recommend that every AI submission that has been substantially modified be uploaded twice: once in the edited form and once in its original form. The original will be credited, like you suggested, to the AI, but the edited form I think should give credit to the editor, with maybe an addendum like ā[AI]ā at the end to indicate itās an AI edit.
Iām not much of a creator, so i donāt think my opinion would mean much, but I do think they should be allowed to some capacity. I certainly donāt want the repo to be flooded with tons and tons of AI art due to the ease at which they can be produced and I understand and agree with the argument around authorship.
In my case, I created(?) portraits of characters from a game i liked for fun and to share if anyone wanted them. Some of them i did heavily edit (providing before and afterās) and put 6-8 hours into most of them, so having my name on something I edited(?) would be nice, but its not the end of the world.
I just want to share them, so if the author was {AI-Generated}, then i donāt think that would hurt. They would certainly need their own category though. I do think they are worth separating from portraits that were either spliced or created from scratch
1 Like
Basically what I gleaned from my research, for someone to claim something as ātheir workā it needs āenough human inputā.
Itās very vague but itās on purpose as everything art-related is very subjective.
So, for example, you may remember that one chimp that took a photo of themselves? Their caretaker tried to copyright the photo, but they were denied on the basis of them not providing enough input and the chimpā¦ Well it aināt no human.
The same is true with AI art recently. Pure generations are impossible to copyright claim.
But you brought up a good point - if you edited the AI generation very much, you should indeed be credited. Tbh, if you just used the AI portrait as an outline, the AI generation part may be omitted altogether as itās no different than just tracing over a picture.
Iāll think about it more tomorrow.
3 Likes
In my opinion (for whatever that is worth) editing an AI creation and taking credit for it is no different than taking a FE GBA portrait, altering it and taking credit for it. There needs to be enough work done to alter it for it to be considered an original piece of artwork. The AI is doing the same thing behind the scenes, scraping the web for art assets, altering them and taking credit for them.
1 Like
It is not how AI models operate but this is not a place to discuss informatics.
1 Like
Nice, have been waiting the female versionās lance & bow animation get completed!
Updated.
For AI mugs, I decided to just slap [AI] tag on them.
4 Likes
Will this [AI] tag replace the {Author} tag or will it be in addition to it?
Yeah, no. Unless we get to a point that no human input is needed.
These animations are absolutely incredible thank you for scripting them!
2 Likes
@Pushwall Are you planning on scripting all of Leoās other animations? 'Cuz I was going to eventually start some of them but you beat me to the punch. I could still help with a few if you want.