yeah that line’s raw as shit actually
15 Likes
Jason pls
Nope, I’m doing it to respond to your argument. Let me break it down:
Situation 1: If I had not been initially clear (ie. I didn’t try hard enough to be understood) and I told you to try harder to understand me, that certainly wouldn’t be constructive or mature.
Situation 2: The thing is though, I DID try hard enough to be understood. It’s in plain English.
If this isn’t telling people to take it seriously, it’s at least telling them not to screw around.
So when you turn it into this:
I can only assume you didn’t understand it or read it wrong, and I thought you’re capable of understanding it, so I tell you to read it again.
So when you talk about it as if it’s situation 1 when it is situation 2:
Uhhhhhhh
So I stand by what I said, and I hope this clarifies my response.
You can admit you didn’t understand it. The only one doing damage control is you, I’m not concerned anything you say will convince anyone, I’m doing this for the fans now
Still wrong.
I thought I would give you a chance to show you understand what I said, and I don’t literally have to explain something I said in clear plain English, which I’ve now done.
I’m not. And you literally didn’t understand. And you are one to talk about deflection when you “respond” to these parts of my counterargument:
with some unrelated bogus about being scared to stand behind what I said when “criticised”.
I don’t think that’s the impression anyone is getting Jason. You won’t respond because I’m right and you can’t admit being wrong.
I’ve been defending my points the whole time. I was not being vague or dismissive, I wanted you to try.
As if that isn’t what I’ve been doing the entire time, and says you. I explained this one
I am obviously right though, and it is your problem that you aren’t getting what I’m saying if you read it wrong which I thought was the case.
It stops being your problem when you say you don’t understand it, but you never did, and at this point I know you’re not capable of understanding it so I clarified it now.
If I said this isn’t a lie, it’s just the truth, you might say I’m saying if you can’t understand me then I don’t have to clarify what I meant in any circumstance, it’s your problem. Not the case.
No it isn’t… you don’t understand the argument I’m making…
Bringing up people hearting me saying you aren’t getting it is to show that it’s clear to THEM what I said, to clue you in that you aren’t getting it. I’m not saying I’m right that you aren’t getting it just because my comment has hearts, I’m trying to get you (and only you) to understand that I’m right you aren’t getting it by saying the hearts show other people understood me, so I was clear, and you are the one that isn’t getting it. I don’t need to make this weird appeal to popularity argument, because I know it’s true. It is a fact that you turned what I said into a nonsense STRAWMAN. I might as well have said the sky is blue.
I never said this? But fine, don’t defend harassment. No Jason, insisting that you read something again that you grossly misunderstood is not harassment. Again I was giving you a chance, you didn’t take it.
Firstly no I’m not. Secondly if you think I’m not saying what I ACTUALLY mean (something I’m “afraid to say”), why are you not saying what it is? And thirdly ohh I guess it’s because it’s obvious so you don’t need to say… right… if these things are as obvious as each other then you’re missing the obvious
Done
He says after making a massive wall of text. If I was trolling you, it would be a resounding success. I only have to do the same thing either way though, which is debunk every thing you said.
If you want to come across as a capable English speaker then you are obligated to read things written in basic English carefully and respond accordingly, until you say you don’t understand, then you can have a clarification. That’s communication being a two-way street: you’re responsible for being clear when you speak and responsible for understanding what was said. The last part is what you’re NOT doing Jason; you should have suspected you weren’t understanding after my last comment at least and asked for clarification, instead you keep insisting your botched translation of what I said is what I said despite evidence to the contrary. If you suspect you’re not understanding someone, ask them.
No you didn’t understand me. Emotional investment doesn’t matter, you are obligated to understand what I said and when I’m telling you that you aren’t getting it and everyone is agreeing with me, that should be alarm bells in your head. In that sense you ARE obligated to try harder.
You owe an apology for not upholding your responsibility of understanding me by asking for clarification and something better than the non-responses you’ve given but I think I won’t be getting either
Doubt
Funny meme however
4 Likes
Sure, sounds awesome!
If the .exe is a LT game there’s a way to get it running on android. I have no idea what it is, but the LT discord can probably tell you.
I am using a Trimui Smart Pro to play which isnt android unfortunately, perhaps my next device will be one that run android. But I can still play on my PC every now and then, just not as convient
2 Likes
I need a Lyn in all of these, especially fox, giant, and giant fox
2 Likes
Feels good to be back.
3 Likes
Love this random chaos but just gonna say on the first one dullahan’s being boring is if you use them unoptiminaly as they can be extremely funny or cool as the head and body become separate beings when the head is detatched meaning the body has a mind of its own when the head is removed leading to some funny shenanigans.
5 Likes
Not sure if this is still up but Mice Miracle, one of my games has a centaur as a main character.
2 Likes
Doesn’t that thing already use Linux? LT uses Python which runs on Linux. I think Python is Linux, or Linux is Python, or Python or Linux is GNU, or… something like that. Run python --version or python3 --version.
Dullahan kinda only have one joke and after a while it gets… pardon the pun… dull.
I will now play your game.
2 Likes