Why so many familiar animaions? Who made them? Permission? Credit?
PS: I have his photos and address.XD
Most of what they stole was from TU or from fe7if(which had itās stuff stolen from various people here).
i donāt even understand the personās response though; like what even is the last part lol
And it seems weāre still the only community that has wonky over-31 stats and not nice looking ones like that hack 
.
1 Like
poor TLPā¦ getting their stuff snagged :\
the creator of that hack sounds like a cuntrocket
1 Like
maybe you should take a peek at it :B
As for the over-31 stats, it is not his work.
And frankly itās annoying/would be great if we could steal their asm XD
This translation is now the highlight of my day ahaha
Tell me we can borrow this permanently, please.
Iām slightly disappointed that they seal mugs and animations, yet they still use vanilla mapsā¦
Right? I guess the power of the language barrier prevents our map software from being useful to them.
No need. The trick is quite simple. Whatās more, over-31 is not his work. I just hope he is able to do that, but it seems that he can only steal sprites.
As a Chinese hack despise himļ¼
I think heās pretty much asking why us Western community hackers take so much pride in copyrighting our stuff.
Itās like saying āOh, itās there so why canāt I use it?ā which Iāve seen in pretty much every āYou stole my work who gave you permissionā scenarios started by our community.
I think the last part is supposed to be an analogy thatās basically asking āWhy do we making such a big deal out of this?ā
No wonder why we donāt have a good over-31 stat display. Our stuff isnāt open-sourced like theirs.
I donāt quite understand that myself. If you make something, doesnāt it make you proud to see people think itās good enough that they want to use it as well?
Itās a courtesy to ask before you use, unless itās part of a public resource collection. I donāt think thereās really a problem with that mindset, but thereās not much we can do about it when they donāt speak our language. The author seems quite rude, regardless.
Public resources are the only real āsolutionā to art theft; if people have enough to work with available to them, they wonāt really need to steal things that arenāt specifically marked āfree to use.ā It isnāt a perfect answer, by any means, but it would certainly help.
2 Likes
nice car iāll just take it
nice shirt iāll just take it
nice meal iāll just take it
nice x iāll just take it
seeing something wrong yet
itās literally just ask; itās no wonder that many of the people whoāve had their work stolen rarely ever post things in the public eye anymore
1 Like
Oh boy itās /that/ discussion again.
The difference being that if I take your car, you no longer have a car. If I ātakeā your sprite, you still have it. Iāve merely made a copy, of which unlimited copies can be made.
1 Like
Itās not about the specific thing, itās about how the concept of ownership applies. Artists own the works by retaining authority over their usage. When they post them publicly, that is an exercise of their ownership, not a license for anyone to come along and violate the artistās wishes just because āoh well itās on the internet now it belongs to EVERYONE!ā
[quote]
Oh boy itās /that/ discussion again.
[/quote]Iām sorry, did I start up something for once? Whoops.
[quote]
The difference being that if I take your car, you no longer have a car. If I ātakeā your sprite, you still have it. Iāve merely made a copy, of which unlimited copies can be made.
[/quote]I think a general mindset is that if itās not āright-click copy pasteā, donāt take it. Stuff like that canāt be easily replaced when taken. If itās all digital, itās very easy to duplicate it effortlessly. I get the feeling that they do it under the impression that it wonāt hurt the original creatorās feelings.
copy-paste was a mistake
itās the idea that itās exactly the same
and who said taking my car meant never coming back, you can bring it back and I still will report you for grand theft auto
stop being so specific, why do you think I included
No. Itās not. Thatās a fallacy. Itās always been a fallacy.
If I take your car and then return it any x amount of time later, youāve been deprived for that amount of time from driving your car.
Short of moving a file off your hard drive and putting it onto mine, copying a sprite is not theft. You still have your sprite. You are not deprived of it.
Thatās the fallacy, you implied ācopyingā = ātheftā. If you had said me scanning your car and poofing an exact copy into existence and driving off with it, then itās no longer a fallacy.
